Hotel scoring matrix — the weighted decision framework

🧮 Framework Free

How to score 8+ hotel responses fairly across 9 weighted criteria. Includes the matrix Easy RFP uses internally + worked example.

By Easy RFP Team · Last reviewed: 2026-05-08

Overview

When 8 hotels respond to an RFP, your brain wants to pick the one with the lowest headline price. That's the wrong decision 60% of the time — total cost, MICE fit, attrition risk, and response speed all matter. A scoring matrix forces objectivity by setting weights BEFORE you read responses, then mechanically applying them. This is the matrix Easy RFP uses internally; we recommend customising the weights to your event archetype but keeping the structure.

How the framework works

Why a scoring matrix

Without a matrix, planners default to single-dimension decisions: cheapest, biggest hotel, best photos. With a matrix, you weight what actually matters across 6-9 dimensions and apply the weighting to every response. The weighting decision happens BEFORE you see responses, which prevents reverse-engineering the weights to favour the hotel you already preferred.

The 9 default criteria

(1) Total cost — the all-in number including F&B service charge, taxes, AV. (2) Location — proximity to attendee origin point or activity destination. (3) MICE fit — meeting space dimensions, AV capability, breakout count. (4) F&B quality — chef-level signal, dietary flexibility, taste-test option. (5) Attrition policy — slippage % at 30/14/7 days. (6) Response time — how fast they replied to the RFP (signal of how responsive they'll be during the event). (7) Force-majeure language — clarity of pandemic/weather cancellation rights. (8) Hotel responsiveness during diligence — quality of follow-up Q&A. (9) Sustainability — ESG signal, certifications (LEED, BREEAM, Green Key).

Default weighting (universal event)

Total cost 25% · Location 15% · MICE fit 15% · F&B quality 10% · Attrition policy 10% · Response time 10% · Force-majeure 5% · Diligence quality 5% · Sustainability 5%. Adjust by event archetype: SKO weights plenary AV at 25% (under MICE fit); QBR weights F&B at 20%; product launch weights brand-takeover capability at 20% (custom criterion).

Scoring scale

Each criterion scored 1-10. 1 = doesn't meet baseline. 5 = meets baseline. 10 = exceeds expectations. Weight × score gives the criterion contribution. Sum of all contributions = composite score (out of 100). Example: total cost weight 25%, hotel scores 8/10 → contribution 20 points.

Worked example

Hotel A: total cost 8 (€57k vs €60k budget) × 25% = 20.0; location 7 × 15% = 10.5; MICE fit 9 × 15% = 13.5; F&B 8 × 10% = 8.0; attrition 6 × 10% = 6.0; response 9 × 10% = 9.0; FM 8 × 5% = 4.0; diligence 7 × 5% = 3.5; sustainability 5 × 5% = 2.5. Composite = 77.0/100. Hotel B might score 71.0, Hotel C 79.5 — go with Hotel C.

BAFO trigger

If top 2 hotels are within 5% of each other on composite (e.g. 79.5 vs 76.5), run a BAFO round. Tell both they're tied; ask each for one revised quote in 48-72h with one improvement (rate concession, extra night, F&B credit). Whoever brings the most value wins.

How to apply it

  1. Define the 6-9 criteria for your event archetype before sending the RFP.
  2. Set weights summing to 100%. Document the rationale.
  3. Share the criteria with hotels in the RFP itself — they quote smarter when they know what you optimise for.
  4. After responses arrive, score each hotel against each criterion (1-10) without looking at composite as you go.
  5. Calculate composites. Top 3 are your shortlist for site visits / BAFO.
  6. Run BAFO round if top 2 are within 5%.

Common gotchas

Next steps

Combine this with the universal hotel RFP template and the contract review checklist for a complete sourcing workflow. If you'd rather automate this, try Easy RFP free — the framework is built into the product.